In partnership with
Agents now issue refunds, update accounts, and close tickets end to end. Running Agents in Customer Work: four Tuesdays on agentic AI in customer ops. Register for All Four
Make Small Decisions Without Asking Others by Using a 3-Second Rule
Before you text “Which one should I choose?” ask:
What useful information could this person give me?
Maybe they know something you don’t. Ask them.
But if you already know the relevant facts and simply want someone to approve your preference, try making the choice yourself.
Here’s a practical exercise: check that the decision qualifies, then give yourself three seconds to choose.
Three seconds is the cutoff for this exercise. The checks happen first.
Decide whether the choice qualifies
Use the rule when all four conditions are true:
The downside is small. A poor choice would cause minor inconvenience.
You can change course easily. Correcting it would cost little.
The choice is yours. You aren’t committing someone else’s time, money, or responsibilities.
You know the relevant facts. There’s no unanswered question that could meaningfully change your choice.
Reversibility is a useful distinction. Amazon’s 2015 shareholder letter separates decisions that are difficult to undo from those that allow an easy change of course, recommending different levels of deliberation.
Apply this exercise to ordinary choices: what to wear from suitable options, which familiar lunch to order, or what to name a personal notes folder.
Leave consequential purchases, health decisions, shared commitments, and difficult-to-reverse choices outside it.
If a fact is missing, name it. “Does this fit my budget?” is answerable. “Will everyone agree with me?” leaves you waiting for approval.
Count down, choose, and act
Once the checks pass:
Three. Two. One. Pick an acceptable option. Take the next action.
Use what matters for this choice: comfort, convenience, cost, or your own preference.
If two options meet your requirements equally well, choose either.
Hypothetical worked example:
You’re choosing between a navy shirt and a gray shirt for dinner.
Both are clean, comfortable, and suitable for the restaurant. You slightly prefer navy, but you’re about to send photos to three friends.
Their replies would give you more preferences. You already have enough information to choose.
Count down. Pick navy. Put it on.
If someone asks why, a simple explanation is enough:
“I liked this one better.”
You don’t need to turn the explanation into another vote.
For more on decisions that delay action, see The Decision Framework That Stops Procrastination Before It Starts.
Give the result one useful review
Afterward, ask:
“Did it meet the requirement?”
If the shirt was suitable and comfortable, the choice did its job. Another option being acceptable doesn’t mean yours failed.
If something went wrong, identify the correction. Perhaps the shirt needed ironing. That gives you one fact to check next time.
Reopen the decision when new information or an actual problem warrants it. A fresh wave of doubt, by itself, gives you nothing new to evaluate.
If decision delays also keep your projects unfinished, this rule handles a small moment. The broader challenge is following through after choosing. The Execution Bundle focuses on decisions, focus, avoidance, and finishing work. Use it this week alongside one stalled project, with a specific result you intend to complete by Friday.
25% off with code 25off.
The next time you reach for your phone to get approval on a minor choice, run the four checks. If it qualifies, count down from three, choose, and take the next action before sending that text.